Prison Fellowship Reduces Recidivism Rate Dramatically!
IFI-Interchange Prison Ministry"Campaigning for Non-Votes" Sam Brownback Goes to Prison February 27, 2007 Believe it or not, it's less than 30 days until the General Election. Thus,there's hardly a potluck dinner or a PTA meeting in either state that won't be graced by the presence of at least one would-be presidential candidate. Even in the era of the "perpetual campaign," there are some places, where you don't, however,expect to find possible presidential candidates. One of them used to be inside a prison. I said, "used to be," because Senator Sam Brownback (R) of Kansas, who has established a presidential exploratory committee, wasn't in Iowa or New Hampshire this past weekend—he was in Louisiana. Specifically, he was in Angola, Louisiana, the site of one of America's most famous—or infamous—prisons. Brownback spent the night in a 7-by-10-foot prison cell. He called his night "a little rough," adding, "I didn't sleep the best." Obviously, Brownback didn't spend the night at Angola for the accommodations. Nor did he do it as some kind of campaign stunt. As he put it, "There aren't probably a lot of votes for me here." What was there was an opportunity to "promote religious-based efforts to curtail violence and provide prison inmates with an alternative to crime once—or if—they got out." Brownback told reporters, "We don't want to build more prisons in the country [and] we don't want to lock people up, We want people to be good, productive citizens. "Not only do these programs make a difference after release, they can also make a difference before prisoners are released. Angola's warden, Burl Cain, has credited "a drop in violence" to these kinds of programs. That's why he and other corrections officials and Inmate Fellowship programs support them. It's not often that you hear a possible presidential candidate saying, "We don't want to build more prisons in this country," or that we're not addressing the "problems and needs" of prisoners. In fact, I can't recall any presidential candidate ever saying anything like this. (And let me add), I don't endorse political candidates, and I am not doing so now, though I think the world of Brownback.) Knowing Sam as I do, I'm not surprised that he spent a night there. He has been a strong supporter of the Inner Change Freedom Initiative® launched by Prison Fellowship in his home state and has stayed in those prisons as well. A practicing Roman Catholic, Brownback understands that a Christian worldview isn't bound by the categories that have rendered American politics empty and stale. Instead, he puts his faith into action, following in the great tradition of William Wilberforce, the English parliamentarian and a hero of mine who led the crusade to abolish the slave trade. Like Wilberforce, Sam knows that the way we treat the "least of these" in our midst is how we measure the quality of our society. Ironically, on the same weekend that Brownback spent a night in jail promoting faith-based programs, the New York Times published a grossly misleading attack on the Innerchange Freedom Initiative. The contrast between competing visions of the common good couldn't have been more stark: The Times ignores real-world results in order to maintain its slanted version of separation of church and state. Brownback, while also committed to this separation, insists that it doesn't require the "removal of faith from the public square." Not unless your goal, that is, is to build more jails.
When two groups of experts disagree about a controversial subject that intersects the public school curriculum students should learn about both perspectives. In such cases teachers should not teach as true only one competing view, just the Republican or Democratic view of the New Deal in a history class, for example. Instead, teachers should describe competing views to students and explain the arguments for and against these views as made by their chief proponents. Educators call this
“teaching the controversy.” Recently, while speaking to the Ohio State Board of Education, I suggested this approach as a way forward for Ohio in its increasingly contentious dispute about how to teach theories of biological origin, and about whether or not to introduce the theory of intelligent design alongside Darwinism in the Ohio biology curriculum. I also proposed a compromise involving three
Main Provisions:
(1) First, I suggested--speaking as an advocate of the theory of intelligent design--that Ohio not require students to know the scientific evidence and arguments for the theory of intelligent design, at least not yet.
(2) Instead, I proposed that Ohio teachers teach the scientific controversy about Darwinian evolution. Teachers should teach students about the main scientific arguments for and against Darwinian theory. And Ohio should test students for their understanding of those arguments, not for their assent to a point of view.
(3) Finally, I argued that the state board should permit, but not require, teachers to tell students about the arguments of scientists, like Lehigh University biochemist Michael Behe, who advocate the competing theory of intelligent design. There are many reasons for Ohio to adopt this approach.
First, honest science education requires it. While testifying before the state board, biologist Dr. Jonathan Wells and I, submitted an annotated bibliography of over 40 peer-reviewed scientific articles that raise significant challenges to key tenets of Darwinian evolution. If students are to be required to master the case for Darwinian evolution (as we think they should), shouldn't they also know some of the difficulties described in such scientific literature? Shouldn’t students know that many scientists doubt that the overall pattern of fossil evidence conforms to the Darwinian picture of the history of life? Shouldn't they know that some scientists now question previously stock Darwinian arguments from embryology and homology? And shouldn't they also know that many scientists now question the ability of natural selection to create fundamentally new structures, organisms and body plans? Last fall 100 scientists, including professors from institutions such as M.I.T, Yale and Rice, published a statement questioning the creative power of natural selection. Shouldn't students know why?
Second, constitutional law permits “teaching the controversy” about scientific theories of origins. In the controlling Edwards v. Aguillard case, the Supreme Court made clear that state legislatures (and by extension state boards) already have the right to mandate teaching scientific critiques of prevailing theories. Interestingly, the court also made clear that teachers have the right to teach students about “a variety of scientific theories about origins . . . with the clear secular intent of enhancing science education.” Our compromise proposal requires teaching existing scientific critique of Darwinism, and permits discussion of competing theories, just as the Court allows.
Third, federal education policy calls for precisely this kind of approach. The report language accompanying the federal education act (“No Child Left Behind”) states that “where topics are taught that may generate controversy (such as biological evolution), the curriculum should help students to understand the full range of views that exist [and] why such topics may generate controversy.” Some have dismissed this language as irrelevant to Ohio's deliberations because it appears in the report accompanying the federal education act, not in the act itself. But report language typically articulates Congress's interpretation of law and guides its implementation. As such, report language expresses federal policy and has the effect of law. In this case, as Ohio's John Boehner, chair of the House education committee, has advised the Ohio Board, the report language makes clear that “science standards not be used to censor debate on controversial issues in science including Darwin’s theory of evolution.”
Fourth, voters overwhelmingly favor this approach. In a recent national Zogby poll, 71% of those polled stated their support for teaching evidence both for and against Darwin's theory of evolution. Only 15% opposed to “evidence that points to an intelligent design of life.”
Finally, good pedagogy commends this approach. Teaching the controversy about Darwinism as it exists in the scientific community will engage student interest. It will motivate students to learn more about the biological evidence as they see why it matters to a big question. This is not only good teaching; it is good science. As Darwin wrote in the Origin of Species, “A fair result can be obtained only by fully stating and balancing the facts and arguments on both sides of each question.” Yet, the modern Darwinist lobby continues to distract attention from their advocacy of censorship by reciting a litany of complaints about the emerging theory of intelligent design. But that theory is not the issue in Ohio. The issue is whether students will learn both sides of the real and growing scientific controversy about Darwinism,and whether a 19th century theory will be taught dogmatically to 21st century students.
Stephen C. Meyer received his Ph.D. in the philosophy of science from Cambridge University. He directs Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture in Seattle, Washington. He testified before the Ohio State Board of Education on March 11th, 2002.
Discovery Institute — Center for Science and Culture 1511 Third Ave., Suite 808 — Seattle, WA 98101 206-292-0401 phone — 206-682-5320 fax email: cscinfo@discovery.org from: prison ministry
Fact Sheet Regarding Iowa Decision June 2006 On June 2, 2006, Judge Robert Pratt of the United StatesDistrict Court for the Southern District of Iowa issued his Opinion inAmericans United for Separation of Church and State, et al. v. PrisonFellowship Ministries, Inc. after a three-week bench trial. The Courtanalyzed the constitutionality of the contract between the IowaDepartment of Corrections ("DOC") and the Inner Change FreedomInitiative, Inc. ("IFI") for a values based, pre-release prisontreatment program. The Court held that while the DOC had a primarily secularpurpose when contracting with IFI, that is, the reduction ofrecidivism, the contract advances religion (By the way, Christianity is A WAY OF LIFE, NOT a religion! Religion can't save anything. Only Christ can!) in its primary effect andfosters excessive government entanglement with religion. As a result,the Court declared the contract to be unconstitutional and permanentlyenjoined further operation of the Program within the Iowa DOC.Additionally, the Court ordered that IFI repay to Iowa all of themonies it has received as payment for its services in operating theProgram since the commencement of the contractual relationship betweenIFI and the Iowa DOC. (1) The Court's decision takes away an effective tool for prisonadministrators to deal with rising recidivism rates, which is a majorsocietal problem. The Court not only admitted that recidivism is a huge problem in Iowa(as it is throughout the country), it also held that the primarypurpose of the Iowa DOC's contract with IFI was to combat therecidivism problem, not to infuse the Iowa prison system with religion.Despite this holding, the Court enjoined the Program from furtheroperation. There is no dispute that the IFI Program is a qualityprogram, which is why prison officials in several states have broughtthe Program to their prison system. There is also no dispute that 60percent of the funds used in the program were privately donated. The 40percent of the funds that come from the State coffers are only used forthe non-sectarian aspects of the program. Moreover, independentstudies by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and the Universityof Pennsylvania have shown that the program is an effective tool inreducing recidivism. Despite this, the Court declared the Programunconstitutional. (2) The Court's decision effectively prohibits people of faith fromhelping to solve this societal problem.The decision calls into question whether a treatment provideraffiliated with any religion may apply for or conduct an in-prisontreatment program. This is unfortunate, as there is no otherorganization- sectarian or not - that offers such comprehensive andintensive treatment and educational opportunities for inmates. (3) The opinion fails to recognize the fact that enrollment in the program is completely voluntary. Every single inmate who testified at trial admitted that he was not coerced into enrolling in the program. Inmates are only exposed to the religious aspects of the program as a result of their voluntary choice.Moreover, inmates who enroll in the program know about and are fully informed about its religious aspects before enrolling. Inmates can also leave the program at any time without penalty. (4) There is no evidence that inmates are coerced into enrolling into the IFI Program. The Court concluded that IFI coerces inmates to convert to Christianity simply because of the quality of the program's offerings to the inmates. Essentially, the Court penalizes the IFI Program because it is a quality program and offers inmates the tools they need to succeed when they are released from prison. The Opinion, despite the Court's attempted rationalizations, creates a "race to the bottom. The Court relied on expert testimony in holding that inmates are coerced into enrolling, but the expert based his conclusions on his interviews with only six plaintiff inmates hand-picked by Plaintiff's counsel.Further, the Court ignored significant testimony (even from Plaintiffs' own witnesses) that some inmates did not want to enroll in the program because of the strict schedule and rules. (5) IFI does not require inmates to convert to Christianity to enroll, progress, or graduate from the program. Perhaps most disturbing about Judge Pratt's decision is the gross oversimplification of evangelical Christians and evangelical Christianity. The Court relied heavily on purported expert (expert?....they better read the Bible some more) testimony that Evangelical Christians by definition must seek to convert others (not true: Only God can convert the inmate, only thing Christians can do is present the facts as outlined in the Holy Scriptures, and the inmates can decide for themselves whether they choose to follow God's plan or the world's Babylonian system. The majority of inmates in our prison system now follow the Babylonian system, thus the high recidivism rate or return to prison) and any action they take must be construed to that end. Yet this expert has never set foot in an IFI classroom to see if this is true, or to determine how IFI uses its curriculum in class. Moreover, it is disingenuous to claim that all Evangelicals try to convert others, especially since every IFI witness testified that they did not try to convert inmates to Christianity. The Court also ignored evidence that IFI makes accommodations for non-Christian inmates, allowing them to attend services of their choice, observe Ramadan, and attend sweat lodge ceremonies, in addition to the fact that non-Christian inmates have graduated from the IFI Program without converting to Christianity. (6) The Court's reliance on the "pervasively sectarian test is out-of touch with current Establishment Clause law. According to the judge, the simple fact that IFI is a pervasively sectarian organization forecloses its receipt of state funds. At least three (probably five) justices on the united States Supreme Court, however, have rejected this principle, stating that it was "born of bigotry. It is the general consensus among the circuits that this is no longer good law. (7) The Court improperly focused on events that happened in 1999/2000 instead of focusing on how the program is run today. The Court admitted that IFI has done a good job disciplining volunteers/staff who act inappropriately, yet seized on dated, inadmissible hearsay testimony from inmates to paint a distorted view of the IFI Program to support its conclusions of unconstitutionality. (8) The Court's ruling on recoupment is unprecedented and lacks any factual basis. The Court ignored the fact that IFI has been providing services to Iowa and its inmates since 1999, under a valid contract arrived at through a competitive bid process, with positive results. The state of Iowa did not ask for these funds back. In fact, all of the DOC witnesses asked agreed that IFI has earned the money that it has received from Iowa and that it has been money well spent. IFI still believes that its program conforms with the Constitution and the Establishment Clause as they are currently interpreted. As the Supreme Court has recognized, and is evident from every stage of this litigation including the 140 page Opinion on the merits of this case, this area of the law is unsettled and nuanced, which clearly contradicts the Court's conclusion that IFI and the State of Iowa should have known that their contract violated the law. 44180 Riverside Parkway Lansdowne, VA 20176 (703) 478-0100 Fax (703) 554-8658 www.prisonfellowship.org `````````````````````````````````````` Brief Challenges $1.5M Ruling Against Iowa Prison Fellowship Sep 15,2006 VALUES-BASED PRISON PROGRAM FILES APPEAL OF FEDERAL JUDGE'S RULING DENYING FAITH'S ROLE IN PRISONER REHAB Inner Change Freedom Initiative & Prison Fellowship Battle Shutdown of Effective Program that Reduces Recidivism, Enhances Public Safety, & Cuts Corrections Costs WASHINGTON, Sept. 13, 2006-Today Prison Fellowship filed their appeal of a federal court order to close a very effective prisoner rehabilitation program in Iowa. The State of Iowa and the Inner Change Freedom Initiative also filed appeals with the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals contesting Iowa Federal Court Judge Robert Pratt's ruling in the lawsuit brought by the Americans United for the Separation of Church and State. On June 2, Judge Pratt ordered that the Iowa Inner Change Freedom Initiative (IFI), a comprehensive, faith-based pre-release program for prisoners that is affiliated with Prison Fellowship, be shut down and that Prison Fellowship and IFI repay the State of Iowa the $1.5 million paid to IFI under a contract for services over the past six years. Judge Pratt ruled that the IFI program was "pervasively sectarian" and thus violated the separation of church and state. "The lower court's decision would handcuff people of faith who are helping corrections officials turn inmates' lives around," said Prison Fellowship President Mark Earley. "What is at stake here, at its heart, is public safety. The key to reducing recidivism and protecting the public from repeat offenses is effective rehabilitative programming like that provided by the Inner Change Freedom Initiative." For nearly a decade, the Inner Change Freedom Initiative has produced dramatic results in changing the lives of hardened criminals and stopping the revolving door of crime. The program presents viable solutions to challenges with which state and local governments struggle. "Corrections officials asked us to establish this program because it works," said Earley. "It helps them reduce recidivism, enhance security within the prisons through improved inmate accountability and behavior, and lowers correctional costs. "For centuries, people of faith have led prison reform efforts in America. Judge Pratt's ruling would put an end to this valuable resource for prison officials who are trying to send inmates back to their communities with transformed hearts and minds." Prison Fellowship and the Inner Change Freedom Initiative are represented in the appeal by The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a nonprofit, nonpartisan, interfaith, legal and educational institute dedicated to protecting the free expression of all religious traditions and Troutman Sanders, LLP, the Atlanta-based international law firm. "There is more at stake in this case than one great prison program," said Kevin J. (Seamus) Hasson, founder and president of The Becket Fund. "The trial court's opinion threatens to obliterate the good works of many faith-based organizations that contract with the government to serve society. In defending Prison Fellowship, we are defending them all." Read the brief in its entirety at: http://www.becketfund.org/index.php/article/534.ht Relevant Cases . Americans United for Separation of Church and State v. Prison Fellowship Ministries and Inner change Freedom Initiative 11/28/06 3:53 PM `````````````````````````````````````` AMICUS BRIEFS On Friday, September 22, several organizations filed "friend of the court" or "amicus" briefs with the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, backing the IFI program in Iowa and urging the appeals court to overturn the ruling against IFI and Prison Fellowship. You may read the briefs themselves here: * Brief by state Attorneys General.....http://www.prisonfellowship.org/generic.asp?ID=2416 * Brief by the American Center for Law and Justice.....http://www.aclj.org/ * Brief by the Alliance Defense Fund.....http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/main/default.aspx * Brief by the Catholic League for Civil and Religious Rights......http://www.catholicleague.org/ This morning, Prison Fellowship issued a press release, which you may read below. THANK YOU for your prayers and continued support. NEWS RELEASE Six High-Profile Groups Ask U.S. Court of Appeals to Overturn Federal Court Denial of Faith as Crime-Buster Amicus Briefs Support Inner Change Freedom Initiative and Prison Fellowship in Continuing Proven, Faith-Based Prisoner Rehabilitation Program WASHINGTON, Sept. 26, 2006-Representing a variety of government, faith-based, and legal entities, six influential groups have filed amicus briefs with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in St. Louis. The parties are asking the appeals court to overturn an Iowa federal judge's ruling against a faith- and values-based prison program that research shows reduces recidivism and makes America's communities safer. (For findings of these preliminary studies and other stats, see the press kit section.) Despite a Zogby International public opinion poll released earlier this year that showed that 70 percent of Americans favor rehabilitative services for prisoners both during incarceration and after release, a federal district court judge in Iowa has ordered the Inner Change Freedom Initiative (IFI) to shut down. He also ordered that IFI, a comprehensive pre-release program for prisoners that is affiliated with the world's largest outreach to prisoners and their families, Prison Fellowship, reimburse the state of Iowa $1.5 million. The money was paid to IFI by the state to run the prisoner rehabilitation program. Groups filing amicus briefs in support of the Inner Change Freedom Initiative and Prison Fellowship include: . The Commonwealth of Virginia and the State of Alabama, as well as seven other states . The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) on behalf of four IFI graduates . A coalition of faith-based organizations that includes the Alliance Defense Fund, National Association of Evangelicals, Teen Challenge, and the Coalition to Preserve Religious Freedom . The Catholic League for Civil and Religious Rights . The National Legal Foundation (NLF) . The Foundation for Moral Law "These amicus briefs demonstrate widespread support across the political, social, and religious spectrum for how the Inner Change Freedom Initiative is transforming prisoners' lives and making our communities safer, " said Prison Fellowship President and former Virginia Attorney General Mark Earley. "These groups-and many others-recognize the importance of overturning this chilling legal decision that threatens to strike a real body blow to religious freedom and puts at risk any faith-based charity that is delivering voluntary services in a public setting. Arguments made in the briefs for overturning the lower court's ruing include: . The IFI program is constitutional as supported by case law; . The crushing repayment of funds ordered in the ruling would discourage faith-based organizations from contracting to perform vital social services for government bodies; . The judge did not base his decision on established case law but on criteria that resulted in hostility toward religion. The Inner Change Freedom Initiative has produced substantial results since its 1997 founding in changing the lives of hardened criminals and stopping the revolving door of crime. In addition to operating in Iowa, IFI provides voluntary services to prisoners in Texas, Minnesota, Kansas, and Arkansas. The program is scheduled to launch in Missouri in early 2007. 11/28/064:03 PM ````````````````````````````````````` ACLJ American Center for Law & Justice A Prison Reform Program That Works For decades, Prison Fellowship Ministries has done a fantastic job at prisoner reform. In fact, statistics show that recidivism rates are as low as 8% as compared with 60% for non-faith-based programs. Those incarcerated should have a faith-based option. Today we filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in St. Louis, Missouri asking the appeals court to overturn a lower court decision ordering the Inner Change Freedom Initiative (IFI) and Prison Fellowship Ministries to reimburse the state of Iowa $1.5 million dollars the state paid IFI to run a faith-based prison rehabilitation program. This is a constitutionally sound and highly effective faith-based program that helps turn troubled lives around. The lower court decision not only removes an effective program with a proven track record, it creates a chilling effect by ordering restitution. We're hopeful the appeals court will correct this flawed decision and uphold the constitutionality of this important program. In our brief, we contend that "if the IFI program were to be dismantled and penalized (especially by the million-dollar-plus restitution order in this case) under the decision below, this would both punish a successful program and profoundly deter any similar program in the future. . ." In the lower court decision, a federal district judge ordered that Prison Fellowship and IFI must stop its operations for the Iowa Department of Corrections and repay the state $1.5 million spent on the program over the past six years. Our brief asserts that the lower court decision will be damaging to those who want to help prisoners through faith-based programs. "The ACLJ is deeply concerned with the chilling effect of the $1.5 million restitution order in this case, which penalizes a private faith-based grantee for its religious activities," the brief explains. "Few faith-based organizations would be willing to contract to perform services for government bodies if such services were forced to take place under the shadow of potentially crushing recoupment orders. Yet the decision below casts precisely such a chilling shadow." We represent Travis Dagel, Sandro Navarro, Robert Robinson, and Rick Theeler - four former prisoners who successfully completed the Iowa IFI program and who are now successfully employed and rebuilding their lives. Dagel summed up the consequences if the IFI program is eliminated: "Would you rather have me come out a changed man or a worse criminal? It wouldn't be right if inmates didn't have a choice to enter a program such as IF!." And, in the words of Theeler, "Without IFI, I would never had been able to change, I would still be doing time. I am living proof that the IFI program helped me to become a different man." Posted: 9/25/20069:30:00 AM ................................................................UPDATE IFI and the New York TimesNote: This commentary was delivered by Prison Fellowship President Mark Earley.Regular “Break Point” listeners and readers know that a federal judge has ordered a highly successful program for prisoners called the Inner Change Freedom Initiative®, or IFI, to shut down because the judge felt it violated the separation of church and state. (First of all this judge;s premise is all wrong. Separation of Church and State is a false and bogus doctrine of the Socialist Democrats) Prison Fellowship strongly disagrees. So do the Justice Department, nine state attorneys general, and numerous faith-based organizations. That’s why Prison Fellowship is appealing the case and why the others I just mentioned have filed friend-of-the-court briefs with the appeals court on IFI’s behalf. Not surprisingly, however, the New York Times agrees with the judge. On its front page last Sunday, the Times ( Also a Socialist Democrat think tank run by the liberal left-wing) ran the following headline above the fold: “Religion for a Captive Audience, Paid for by Taxes.” The headline alone tells you the kind of picture the Times intended to—and, in fact, did—paint: inmates coerced into participating in a government-funded religious program. But what did the Times not tell us in that article? First, the Times failed to mention that prisoners who participate in the program do so voluntarily. Every potential participant is told about the religious aspects of the program. Participants may leave it at any time without penalty. And they do not need to accept or profess Christianity to graduate. That’s why every prisoner who testified at trial said that he was not coerced into enrolling in the program.Neither did the New York Times tell you about what the judge considered to be “coercion”: offering inmates a quality program and the tools they need to succeed on the outside, such as drug treatment, job preparedness, and general education. These are what he regarded as bait to lure unsuspecting prisoners into a Christian program where they can be converted! (Which reminds me people, the next time you vote make sure you check the boxes that contain what judges will remain in office) The Times did tell you that one Catholic inmate left the program because he felt IFI was hostile to his faith. (That's quite possible, since there is only One God that deserving of Worship,and while the Times granted that the program does not condone anti-Catholicism—which, of course, it doesn’t—it didn’t tell you that the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights filed an amicus brief on IFI’s behalf. In its zeal to make it look like the taxpayers are picking up the tab for jailhouse evangelism and indoctrination—their words, not mine—the Times didn’t tell readers that Prison Fellowship pays 60 percent of IFI’s costs in Iowa. The other 40 percent paid by the state of Iowa, pursuant to a competitive bid contract, is used for the non-sectarian or non-religious aspects of the program. While the Times did note that attorneys general in nine states “fiercely protested” the judge’s decision, and that IFI has been “widely praised by correctional officials and politicians,” it didn’t tell you why. The reason is that IFI has been proven to help states (reduce recidivism from 70% to 6%!, judge), as shown by a study by the University of Pennsylvania. And it helps states to manage corrections costs. (Maybe judge, YOU would like to pick up those costs then) In short, state officials like IFI because it works. The Times article has been picked up by other newspapers across the country. On one hand, I’m glad that IFI is receiving front-page coverage. On the other hand, I’m left feeling that the Times has chosen not to report all the news that’s fit to print. JBT Ventures would like to add some resources for the readership to encourage everyone who has family members in prison, that God is indeed freeing His people through the Mike Barber Ministries
Every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus, is not from God. This is the spirit of the anti-Christ , which you have heard is coming and even now is in the world. You dear children (prisoners) have (and can) overcome them, because the one who is in you is greater than the one who is in the world. 1 Jn. 4:3-4. I can do everything through Him who gives me strength.Phil. 4:13 He who has ears, (and eyes) let him hear (and see)Matt. 11:15 Forget the former things; do not dwell on the past.Isa. 43:18 There over 3 million men and women in prison, and God can release all of them. Cast your cares on the Lord and He will sustain you;...Ps. 55:22 See, the former things have taken place, and new things I declare; before they spring into being I announce them to you.Isa. 42:9 The Spirit of the Sovereign Lord is on me, because the Lord has an anointed me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim freedom for the captives and RELEASE from darkness for the PRISONERS,...Isa. 61:1 These are powerful words from Jesus that if heard and acted upon will change lives around the world. I invite you to search out the ministry of Mike Barber. Watch the video and be blessed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Freedom From Depression Why are you downcast, O my soul? Why so disturbed withinme? Put your hope in God, for I will yet praise HIM my Saviorand my God Psalms 42:5
Freedom From Sexual Confusion But at the beginning of creation, GOD made them male and female. For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh. So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what GOD has joined together, let man not separate. Mark 10:6-9
Freedom From Gambling I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good. As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me. I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my sinful nature. For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. For what I do is not the good I want to do; no, the evil I do not want to do-this I keep on doing. Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it. Romans 7:15-20
Freedom From Anxiety Cast all your anxiety on HIM because HE cares for you. 1 Peter 5:7
Freedom From Sexual Abuse Fathers, do not embitter your children, or they will become discouraged. Colossians 3:21
The Refiners Fire But seek first HIS kingdom and righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. Matthew 6:33
The Altar Call For GOD so loved the world that HE gave HIS one and only SON, that whoever believes in HIM shall not perish but have ETERNAL LIFE. John 3:16 If you are a person who is broken and tired of looking for love in all the wrong places, a person who feels you're not good enough or the sins you have committed are too great, all you have to do is look up and surrender to THE ONE who has been waiting for you. HIS arms are wide open and ready to give you HIS ETERNAL LOVE through HIS SON JESUS CHRIST. Just pray this prayer with a true and pure heart: Father please help me, I know I am a sinner and I need you. I ask for your forgiveness of all my sins. I ask you JESUS to come into my life and to be my LORD and SAVIOR in JESUS NAME amen. Congratulations, you are now a member of GOD'S family. Please, from this point on, go get involved with a church that is close to you and read the WORD of GOD daily and watch what HE will do in your life though CHRIST JESUS. GOD BLESS you.
An incredible story of a woman who experienced love, fame, money and success only to discover a lie so pervasive in our culture it stripped away her own identity. This is a powerful, page-gripping account of a courageous woman tested by fire and on the edge, desperate and seeking for love in all the wrong places. From the bright lights of the stage as a Stevie Nicks look-a-like entertainer, to featuring in nightclubs, to a lonely prison cell - and beyond. This true story will captivate your heart and reveal the true meaning of love.
................................................................ Discover more design graphics and EARN an affiliate income....FREE sign-up....click below
We would like to call your attention to the following areas of concern in today's marketplace. Discover some of the many sites that have been designed using SiteBuildIt!. To maximize your advertising dollars the designs are according to the Great Creator of the Universe and His timely wisdom. Tap into some of these great resources as you continue your Venture In Success, and if God is calling you for something bigger in your life and could support our ongoing ministry, you can do so through Pay Pal, and also earn a residual income. So, check us out, bookmark this page and come back often. God bless! ......................................................................................................................................................................
Keep, Track, Log and Re-promote FREE - Click HERE 
 Jesus Christ Being The Chief Cornerstone        
To return to Venturtes In Success Home Page, click here
|
Through Fire and Waterby Cheryl Cusella
......................................................................................................................................................................
